|
PERSONAL COMMENTARY 05/10/06 |
|
|
|
|
Medical Studies have shown that there is probably nothing that you can place in the human body that the body will not attempt to break down. Silicone implants in the body are broken down over time through a lipolysis reaction. Most silicone-filled breast implants leak or rupture within 8 to 15 years. FACT In 1997, The Mayo Clinic found one in four women with implants will need surgery within five years for ruptures or other disfiguring complications. FACT What effect does silicone have on the enzyme system, cell membranes, DNA damage, interference with repair mechanisms and the effect on energy production? Stephen M. Frailich, owner of the Law
Offices of Stephen M. Frailich, A
Professional Law Corporation, has been
a practicing attorney for the past 23
years. Mr. Frailich has specialized in
Personal Injury Litigation and Breast
Implant Class Action claims, and has
obtained more then $68,000,000 in
settlements on behalf of his clients.
CONTACT US
Law Offices of Stephen M. Frailich Breast Implant Law 22287 Mulholland Highway, PMB No. 409 Calabasas, Ca. 91302 (818) 223-9064 (818) 223-9062 (Fax) Visit the breast implant blog Call Toll-Free 1-800-573-3236 (24 Hour Voice Mail) E-MAIL: smflawcorp@aol.com |
BREAKING NEWS BREAKING NEWS UPDATE 9/01/04
Now that the Dow Plan has started, there are many areas of concern that are involving many claimants. If you have any of the following problems, we may be able to help you:
We have received quite a bit of correspondence from Claimants who are having the above problems, which has also affected many of our clients. We have noticed that the SFDCT/DOW CORNING has accepted Cronin implants after 1971, but on an inconsistent basis. We are filing Appeals on behalf of our clients to have this inconsistency addressed and corrected. If you received a Notice of Intent Survey from the SFDCT saying you may not be able to participate unless you match a co-debtor claim under Rule 3005, did you know if you file a claim now in the MDL-926 Class Action, this should resolve the problem? Please do not ask me to explain this silly complicated rule that does not make sense. If the Affidavit from your doctor has been rejected by the SFDCT, under certain circumstances the Affidavit can be amended, so the affidavit will be accepted by the SFDCT. The most unfair portion of the MDL-926 and Dow Corning Class Action, has to do with claimants who received an implant covered under the MDL-926 Class Action and received a settlement based on 50%, because they also “allegedly” received a Dow Corning implant. There are many cases where the SFDCT is not accepting the claimants Dow Proof, and the MDL-926 Claims Administrator refuses to honor the settlement at 100%! I have discussed this matter with Federal Judge U.W. Clemon, who is aware of this problem, and it is my understanding that the Claimant Advisory Committee will be meeting with Judge Hood to discuss this issue. Unless there is a resolution or new rule that comes from Judge Hood’s office, my office plans on forcing this issue by filing Appeals with the MDL-926 Claims Office, and the Court if necessary, to get a formal ruling on this matter. Ever feel no one is listening to you when you are trying to convince the SFDCT that you should be in Category 5 and not some other category because you have proof you received a Dow Corning implant? You are not alone. You have to be persistent in communicating with the SFDCT to make these changes. If you are not receiving a response, you do have certain options at your disposal? Have you decided to accept the $2,000 Expedited Settlement Benefit, and then changed your mind? If so, and you have not cashed the check, you still can make a disease benefit claim, REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE SFDCT HAS BEEN INFORMING YOU. If you are having any of the above problems, you can contact our office or fill out a Contact Form and email to our office.
|